By Gareth Henderson, Standard Staff
A plan to transition the Woodstock Union High School and Middle School to a single-administration system for grades 7-12 got the WUHSMS Board’s approval last week, during an April 12 meeting that turned contentious after several parents and teachers raised issues around communication and feedback.
Woodstock’s high school and middle school have long existed under separate administrations, with separate principals.
The board had voted at its March 13 meeting to develop a single administration 7-12 system, and the document presented on April 12 was a proposal created by WUHS Principal Garon Smail, at the board’s request, to do just that.
Also, Middle School Principal Dana Peterson is leaving his position at the end of this school year. The board on March 13 accepted Peterson’s letter of intent to not renew his contract, which was up this year.
As the board has discussed the 7-12 leadership transition in recent weeks, incoming Superintendent Mary Beth Banios has been receiving updates from the board.
The “7-12 Leadership Transition Model” presented by Smail on April 12 includes two new positions that the board is now hiring for, a curriculum director and an associate principal. As part of the overall job, the associate principal will oversee interdisciplinary teams for grades 7, 8 and 9 within the new structure, which, Smail later explained, is designed to make transitions between those grades smoother.
The plan also includes several main goals, including sustaining middle and high school best practices that are already working, and emphasizing “collaboration among faculty, staff and administrators across grade levels and alignment of curriculum across grades.”
Before the audience weighed in on the 7-12 plan at the April 12 meeting, teacher Keri Bristow shared a letter on behalf of the staff, which was dated April 11 – the day before the plan’s latest version was presented to the board on April 12. The letter asked the board to delay the 7-12 restructuring for at least a year, saying the additional time will give stakeholders and the board time “to create an administrative structure best suited to promoting student success.”
Bristow, noting it’s been tough when staff and administration have disagreed, pointed out, “We’re not here to tear things apart, we’re here to build them up and work together.”
WUHSMS Board Chair Paige Hiller said she and board member Perrin Worrell attended a meeting on April 11 with staff members, where staff shared concerns about this plan with Superintendent Alice Worth.
“Out of that meeting, there was a lot of reflection, at least on my behalf, on what I’ve heard,” Hiller said, adding that she’s also read staff responses to surveys on this matter.
Though the board stated its goals on the April 12 proposal Smail presented, Hiller said, “What I think we fell short on, is being more inclusive of your thoughts as to how we move forward.” She added that the overall system will be stronger “if all of us believe in what we’re moving towards … and we all want this to be the best model for our students.”
Hiller also acknowledged the desire among the staff for a more fluid transition from grades 7 and 8 to the high school.
“I heard you loud and clear yesterday, and I thank you for your honesty,” Hiller said.
She added that the board did not intend to “sweep (grades) 7 and 8 under the rug,” noting the needs of the middle school will be treated sensitively.
After an explanation of the proposal by Smail, parent Katy Merrill asked how the board arrived at the proposed model for the single-administration 7-12 system, and whether there had been any third-party consultants involved.
Smail pointed out that, while there will be adjustments, “we have been operating as a pretty unified building” already.
He said a key factor in the new structure is that “(having) fewer transitions is better for students.” He added that, in building the new model, he talked with various schools around the state about their experiences with a 7-12 administrative system. Smail also noted the expertise in-house at the school.
“There’s a lot of great thinking among this professional staff,” he said.
Merrill asked if an educational consultant was involved in the process, if there was a “third party.”
“It seems like a knee-jerk reaction,” she said.
That comment drew a strong objection from WUHSMS Board member Jim Haff.
“This has been discussed multiple times over the last four years,” Haff said.
He also objected to a part of the letter Bristow had presented, which listed “a disregard for teacher input” among the staff’s concerns.
“That, to me, is a slap in this board’s face,” Haff said.
He added, “We have complete recognition of our students.” That was in response to another part of the letter presented by Bristow, which listed a concern over a “lack of recognition that students of different ages have different developmental needs.”
Merrill, after Haff’s comments, replied, “You’re very hostile, that’s all I have to say.”
Also at the meeting, Haff and fellow board member Dwight Doton each noted that a number of board members currently have – or have had – their own children in the school.
Doton made the motion to approve the plan, and he also moved that “the board advertise for an appropriate associate principal.” Haff seconded.
Doton also said the 7-12 model had been discussed before.
“These are warned meetings,” he said. “There’ve been discussions every month. Everyone at this table
has been elected.”
Elaine Leibly, who has a seventhgrader and ninth-grader in the school, noted, “Mr. Smail and Mr. Peterson have said they want to increase communication with the parent community and with the teacher community.” She thought getting that feedback should be part of a specific person’s job within the new 7-12 organizational structure.
Later on in the meeting, WUHSMS Board member Perrin Worrell suggested a motion to table the plan for 30 days to gather more feedback from the community, so people feel more comfortable with the plan.
However, the motion to approve the proposed 7-12 single-administration plan was already on the floor.
A move to add the 30-day feedback period in as an amendment, which was proposed by board member Bob Coates, failed for lack of a second. Haff, who had seconded the original motion, would have had to also second the amendment for it to be voted on (according to Robert’s Rules of Order), however he declined.
“It doesn’t receive my second at this point,” Haff said. “I think the communication is already there.”
The original motion passed, with Worrell casting the sole dissenting vote.
At that point, Hiller had encouraged people to reach out to Smail with their feedback about the plan.
As the comments continued on at the meeting, Sarah Callander said it is difficult for many to make evening meetings, noting that this is a national problem.
“It doesn’t say they don’t care, if they don’t go to every board meeting,” she said.
Haff asked how long the board would keep taking comments on this matter.
“It just gets crazy going over and over and over it again,” he said.
After Haff continued to question the direction of the meeting, Hiller told him, “Jim, stop – stop.” She noted that about 50 people had come to talk with the board.
“It is our opportunity to hear them out,” she said.
Teacher Ryan Becker pointed out that this was the first time the staff is seeing this version of the plan that was presented on April 12. He lamented the tone of the meeting at that point.
“I’m feeling a little bit vilified for being here,” Becker told the board. “I beg you to try to help us work through that.”
He also said, “It’s one thing to ask for teachers’ voices, it’s another to follow up on those suggestions.”
Also during the meeting, teacher Tim Brennan said the plan, as presented on April 12, was “a really important step forward.”
Parent Mark Lackley noted, “I think there’s a lot of support among parents for moving to a single leader for 7-12.”
Another key part the plan presented on April 12, is an emphasis on “personalized learning” – opportunities for students to be involved in the learning process.
Smail said important questions involved in the new plan are, “How do we build that multi-tiered system of support?” and “How do we really maintain what’s good and right (in the existing system), but at the same time grab onto some other opportunities?”
Also at the meeting, retired teacher Nancy Pejouhy raised concerns about maintaining existing practices around scheduling and transitioning sixth graders into the middle school.
Smail replied that continuing the practices that work is definitely part of the plan.
“We have a lot of really well-established, well thought-out things,” he said. “We have to be sure that we maintain those, before we start doing any real shift.”
In an interview on Friday, Smail emphasized the importance of having sensitivity toward the needs of different grades in the 7-12 system, including the middle school.
“In one system, you can have targeted, different experiences” among the grades, Smail said.
Also at the April 12 meeting, Hiller said the plan is not “set in stone” and meetings will continue through the summer with the new superintendent, Banios, about the transition to the new structure.